Utilitarian Principle of Utility

Category:

Description

Utilitarian Principle of Utility.

The Utilitarian principle of utility postulates that whatever actions or behaviors are done they are right as long they promote pleasure or a state of wellbeing and they are deemed wrong if they in the end produce pain or a state of unhappiness. Therefore, utility is now seen as a teleological principle. This now in turn brings about the question, what about hedonism; we know very well that a hedonist is an individual that, believes in the pursuit for pleasure as the most important thing in their life. Hedonism is discussed in most Teleological theories. But in contradiction to what a hedonist believes in pleasure and pain are all but biological functions that originate solely from out central nervous system, which is controlled by the cerebral cortex. This is the reason behind the pleasures we experience when in pursuit of our normal biological functions such as having sex, eating, and drinking. One being a hedonist may believe that pleasure and pain are purely objective and can be measured on a scale. Or can be seen as a point to point calculation or even seen as calculus. Being a hedonist the question one should ask oneself is whose pleasure counts the most this is attributed to the question is it good or is it bad. When looked at the Good affects most people positively and the bad also a larger number of people negatively. The principle is further seen to recognize the role of pleasure and pain in the day to day life of man, the most intriguing facet of this principle is that it is measurable and it being measurable is question of great contention but in principle it is possible and doable. (“Jeremy Bentham (1748 – 1832): The Principle of Utility”, 2018)

Utilitarian Principle of Utility

Some of the problems faced by leaders who are solely utility based are problems, since utility justifies to some extent. Things that are not morally astute at some point this is done mainly in bias to happiness, in the case of military leaders this is not the best road taken as the military requires a strike code of conduct and rarely does it allow for pleasure. And this will be a problem if the leader uses utilitarianism, as the military leader cannot make his troops happy and the same time accomplish the mission. This is just but the beginning of this principle, as the leader will also not be willing to send their employees out into an unpleasant situation. And this defies all work ethics, since in the end work must be done. Mission objectives must be achieved and profits must be made, hence these are the disadvantages of Utilitarianism. These are just but some of the problems these leaders will have to face at the end of the day. (“I”, 2018)

 

Utilitarian Principle of Utility

The comparison between Kant and the Utilitarian approach brings, according to Kant’s ethics is the goodwill that people in the political arena as a real-life example should expect. This can only be determined in absolution and it is to be done as the only right way out as an obligation as in serving a people in politics one should be absolutely motivated to do what is right and it is in this manner not seen as spontaneous. But as an act of absolution. On the other hand utilitarianism allows variations in the way the political arena should be run it allows that each case be treated as special and dealt with one completely different from the other and the other different from the one.  In another aspect, Kant’s perspective is that whatever is done is done in consequence of what is already in play; this is what Kant aims at. As an example in the political arena whenever a politician does something for their constituents it should be in consequence to what is happening or in consequence to what is about to happen. In the utilitarianism, what is done is done with the intention of a unique outcome in the end. It is an act first principle. One acts and because of their actions something happens. This in view to politics is the best forward way as it would be eventually beneficial to the parties involved and would bring out more good as a result of the premeditated outcome. An act first principle is one of the positive aspects of the utilitarianism and it can lead to much positive effects provided the right steps forward are followed.(“Compare and Contrast Kant’s Duty Ethics with Utilitarianism | Essay Writing Blog”, 2018)

 

References.

Jeremy Bentham (1748 – 1832): The Principle of Utility. (2018). SchoolWorkHelper. Retrieved 23 March 2018, from https://schoolworkhelper.net/jeremy-bentham-1748-1832-the-principle-of-utility/

 

  1. I. (2018). tamu.edu. Retrieved 23 March 2018, from http://isme.tamu.edu/JSCOPE98/PFAFF98.htm

 

Compare and Contrast Kant’s Duty Ethics with Utilitarianism | Essay Writing Blog. (2018).Essay4you.net. Retrieved 23 March 2018, from https://essay4you.net/blog/compare-and-contrast-kants-duty-ethics-with-utilitarianism/