Sport Organization Policy Analysis

$20.00 $10.00



Sport Organization Policy Analysis

Organization’s Name

The organization whose policy is analyzed in this essay is Swimming Australia. The organization is the peak body, which governs Australia’s competitive swimming (Australia, 2010). Nationally, the organization presently has over 100,000 registered members in the 1100 clubs. The membership varies between different people and they can be volunteers, administrators, officials, coaches and swimmers (Robinson et al., 2011). The organization’s main responsibility is to oversee the development as well as the management of sport from the national team at level of elite, the conduct of international and national events, through to the participation at grass roots.  The body’s vision is to become the nation’s (Australia’s) leading sport via commercial excellence, continual outstanding performance as well as increased participation (Australia, 2010). As early as 1985, Swimming Australia had over 90,000 members who were registered.

Sport Organization Policy Analysis: Policy Name

Since its establishment, the organization has been effective in implementing its core values and vision through remaining committed to the safety, health and general well-being of all its members (Australia, 2010). Swimming Australia is dedicated to offering a safe environment for every member and of service providers participating in all its activities (Bringer et al., 2006). In order to ensure all this, the organization, has over the years, enacted a number of policies from within itself and those adopted from the larger framework. One such policy is the Child Welfare Policy (Robinson et al., 2011).

Implementation Date

According to Australia (2010), The Child Welfare Policy has gone through a series of versions since Swimming Australia first endorsed it. The first version of the policy first came into existence in 2002. Later in 2006, a second version was presented. This version was split into two policies including Child Welfare and Member Welfare (Australia, 2010). In addition, the version of the policy reviewed the information split out and the general procedures so that a separate document was implemented..