Response: Richard III
Write a well-structured response (at least 4 pages, or 1200 words) to the following article.
The Greyfriars Research Team. “The Bones Tell Their Tale” and “Who was Richard?” from The Bones of a King.
In contrast to a Summary of an article, a Response asks you to identify the writer’s main point–the argument he or she makes–and respond to it, letting us know if you agree or disagree with the claim and telling us why you agree or disagree with it.
In order to write this response, then, you will need to be able to summarize the Greyfriars’ chapters as part of your pre-writing activities. When you begin writing the Response paper itself, however, you do not need to provide a lengthy summary of them. Rather, the response should mention the Greyfriars’ main point in the introduction, which should also forecast your response to it. That is, your introduction should tell us what the Greyfriars’ main point or points are, and it should let us know if you agree with them or not. In the body of your paper, in order to help set up your response, you might include a lengthier summary of the Greyfriars’ chapters (say, a paragraph or two) if it helps you to set up your response. The majority of the paper should spend time giving us the reasons why you agree or disagree with the Greyfriars Research Team. Be sure to support your response by discussing the Greyfriars’ chapters and, especially, Shakespeare’s play in detail. Cite the play in order to support your response.
The Greyfriars research team embarked on an excavation procedure around the vicinity of Leicester. The main aim of the excavation was to show the condition of medieval Leicester. The scholars met a discovery that would bring a lot of talk, in the archaeological and historical world. The discovery of the skeleton of Richard III. DNA analysis proved it was, in fact, his remains. Further morphological observation would show that the king had a hunchback. It would show that Shakespeare’s description was factual. Besides, analysis would show his circumstances surrounding his death.
Research is always a crucial way to prove the existence of something. Moreover, discovery proves or disapproves a fact. The Greyfriars represent a group of individuals, who wanted to prove or disapprove a fact. They carried out an excavation so as to find the remains of King Richard III. Consequently, it would help prove the way the king died. Besides, it would show the morphological characteristics of the king. Their efforts became successful in February 2013. It is important to note that the research team was from Leicester University.
The archaeological team published the narrative, ‘The Bones of a King’. It was influential in setting up the state of the scene before, during, and after the discovery. The archaeological team published the book. However, the book contains context that non-specialists can understand. This book contains a lot of information about Richard III. Besides, it has his accomplishments and failures as a king. Needless to say, DNA analysis proved it was, indeed, his body. Consequently, there were vast research activities that informed researchers of the food that he used to eat…………………………………
Besides, the research team made very conscious decisions when choosing the site of DNA analysis. The clean-room lab would prevent contamination with modern DNA. The consequent DNA analysis came from the teeth. Scholars always suggest that the jaw has the most well preserved DNA. In fact, it would help in the evaluation of the genetic characteristics of King Richard.
Shakespeare depicted King Richard with a hunchback and a withered arm. However, many skeptics suggested that it was sort of a propagandist view. They assumed the descriptions were not factual. Nevertheless, the analysis of the skeletons would now prove the legibility of the allegations. The use of Post Mortem Computed Tomography showed the state of the bones. It would serve as a preservation outline of the state of the bones. The permanent records would support the scanning methods of the skeleton bones.
The team provided very reliable results. They had to determine the sex of the individual. It would help foster the identity of the individual. They decided to carry out an analysis on the structure of the pubic bones. The bones had masculine features. The bones were narrow, unlike female pubic bones that are always wide to support the fetus. Besides, the DNA analysis cemented the fact that the individual was male. It had the Y chromosome in the resulting analysis………………..