Nuclear Weapons Argument Essay

Category:

Description

Nuclear Weapons Argument Essay

Introduction

“Fat Man” and “Little Boy” were the codenames for the atomic bombs the United States dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. These two bombs had the effect of causing widespread devastation, which leveled both cities and killed more than eighty thousand and one hundred and sixty thousand people in Nagasaki and Hiroshima respectively. These two nuclear weapons were the only ones any country has employed in warfare (Bennett N.p). The devastation and the long-term impact have been influential in fuelling the perception that the use of nuclear weapons should never occur even in the setting of warfare. However, the incidents in Hiroshima and Nagasaki occurred a long time ago. The current era is notable for nuclear weapons that are more than three thousand times as strong as those dropped in Nagasaki and Hiroshima were.  “Fat Man” produced around twenty-one kilotons (Bennett N.p). The latest weapons such as the B83 have the potential of producing an excess of 1.2 megatons, which equate to more than one million tons of TNT, which makes it around eighty times more powerful and dangerous than the bombs dropped in Japan (Bennett N.p). The technologies involved in the delivery of these weapons has immensely evolved, thus increasing their danger and strengthening the case for banning them on a universal level.

 

 Nuclear Weapons Argument Essay

Nuclear Weapons are a Legitimate Right for Every Country

Nuclear weapons represent the most destructive among the weapons ever developed. The right of countries to own and utilize these weapons has been a subject of considerable contentious debate in the global community. Some countries such as the United States, Israel, and Britain seeking to limit the capabilities of nations to own. Other nations such as Russia, Iran, and North Korea citing the ownership of nuclear weapons as their right (UNODA N.p). Despite the complexity of the debate, the clear indication is that nuclear weapons enhance the ability of nations to defend themselves through nuclear weapons even in contexts where they lack capabilities in conventional weapons. Additionally, the states with nuclear weapons have enhanced agenda-setting power on the global stage. Additionally, nuclear weapons increase the potential of nations to diffuse conflicts when they arise (Borrie 630). However, the capability to ensure the provision of safety in the handling and development of the weapons ought to precede this right. The requirement for ensuring that the countries can adhere to safety measures in the handling of nuclear weapons emanates from the need to avoid accidents such as Chernobyl, which arose from the flaws in the design of the reactors and the incompetence of the workers. Therefore, the right to have nuclear should come with the responsibility of ensuring safety (World Nuclear Association N.p).

Dangers to Humanity

The notion that the nuclear weapons currently in use incorporate significant technological advancements that increase their danger implies the enhanced potential of damage to humanity animals and the modern infrastructure in its modern form. The potential of death far exceeds that of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Densely populated areas such as Pakistan and India face the prospect of dealing with up to twelve million deaths (Jha N.p). An attack on the United Kingdom could lead to the immediate deaths of more than three million people. Geography would serve to constrain the human losses. However, the environmental losses would spread globally.

The damage to the environment implies that the impact of nuclear weapons extends to the animals, which would notably suffer from the increased radiation and altered ecosystem. In this context, the large majority of the animals that are already facing extinction would disappear completely (Jha N.p). Equally under threat would be the large majority of the animals in the sea and the land, which would face depletion from the explosion of the nuclear bombs and related weapons.

Dangers to the Earth-nuclear Weapons Argument Essay

Aside from posing significant dangers to people and animals, nuclear weapons are considerably detrimental to the environment and the climate. The studies conducted on this issue indicate that even a small-scale war involving these weapons has the potential of rapidly devastating the climate and the ecosystems of the earth and causing damage that can last for decades. For instance, detonating around fifty bombs, which represents merely 0.03% of the global arsenal would produce a huge degree of soot into the atmosphere, which can trigger climatic anomalies that world has not experienced over the course of its existence (Jha N.p). The effects of even a small-scale nuclear war involving nuclear weapons can deplete the ozone layer by around forty percent, thus exposing the earth to the harmful radiation of the sun. In the current era, nuclear weapons represent the most significant environmental threat to the earth.

Conclusion-nuclear Weapons Argument Essay

The increase in the technologies for developing and delivering nuclear weapons coupled with the dangers associated with the detonation of even a few nuclear bombs enhance the case for banning nuclear weapons. Despite the notion that countries have a right to acquire, the weapons they deem fit for ensuring protection, the risks associated with nuclear weapons accidents and potential wars are too significant for the world to bear. Nuclear weapons represent the most dangerous threat to the existence of humanity and the earth, which implies the need for restraining measures such bans.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Works Cited

Bennett, Jay. “Here’s How Much Deadlier Today’s Nukes Are Compared to WWII A-Bombs.”    Popular Mechanics, Popular Mechanics, 14 Nov. 2017,          www.popularmechanics.com/military/a23306/nuclear-bombs-powerful-today/.

Borrie, John. “Humanitarian reframing of nuclear weapons and the logic of a ban.” International   Affairs 90.3 (2014): 625-646.

Jha, Alok. “Nuclear Bombs Pose Threat to Environment, Scientists Warn.” The Guardian,            Guardian News and Media, 12 Dec. 2006,             www.theguardian.com/environment/2006/dec/12/nuclearindustry.climatechange.

UNODA. “Nuclear Weapons – UNODA.” United Nations, United Nations,             www.un.org/disarmament/wmd/nuclear/.

World Nuclear Association. “Chernobyl Accident 1986.” Chernobyl | Chernobyl Accident |          Chernobyl Disaster – World Nuclear Association, www.world-nuclear.org/information-           library/safety-and-security/safety-of-plants/chernobyl-accident.aspx.