Analyzing of the Case Study for Avco Environmental Service Company
From the information provided in the case study, the stakeholders who are going to be affected in this scenario are numerous. To begin with, the members of the public are in danger because of the threat that is posed by the dumping of the hazard waste in the environment. It is because the waste may lead to the emergence of fatal diseases such as cholera and typhoid. These illnesses have the capacity of destroying the lives of several people within a short period of time.
Moreover, some of the employees of the organization are in danger of losing their jobs. For instance, the Operations Manager of Avco Environmental Service is in danger of losing her job because of the ignorance that has been portrayed by her. It is wrong for Angela to subscribe to the idea that disposing of waste in small amounts does not have a detrimental effect on the environment. Besides, her belief that the action of polluting the environment via small amounts of the pollutant would lead the company to enjoy a comparative advantage over other firms is wrong. She disregards that there are environmental groups that would monitor the behavior of the company and therefore react. Their reaction may involve writing a letter to the management of the organization seeking for an explanation. The management may not swallow these complains and therefore their actions may entail firing the operations manager of the firm. Equally, the supervisor of Chantalle is in danger because of demonstrating high levels of negligence.
Similarly, another stakeholder that may be affected by the actions of Avco Environmental Service is the organization itself. It is because the government of the nation may feel that the organization is negligent and therefore fails to meet one of the ideal conditions for a firm to remain in operation. To that end, the government officials may advocate for the closure of the Company for polluting the environment knowingly. It is because of the fact that they have the understanding of the danger posed by the dumping of the waste into the environment.
Question 2 Analyzing of the Case Study for Avco Environmental Service Company
There are several ethical issues that arise in the case study. The first ethical issue that needs to be evaluated is the operations manager’s view that the action of littering the environment with the hazardous waste is an approach of cutting down the costs. However, this ethical issue is right-wrong because of the health implications of the waste.
Equally, the situation of Chantelle brings about an ethical issue. It is because of the fact that she understands the significance of the safety of the environment. However, there is no one who seems to care. She is afraid of losing her job because of the fear that the management may feel that she is irritating. According to me, this ethical issue is right-wrong because the situation is hindering Chantelle from doing what is morally right.
The actions of the supervisor also bring ethical issues because she subscribes to the opinion that the action of polluting the environment is not her business and therefore neither Chantelle nor herself should be concerned. It is because polluting the environment has a health hazard which may be detrimental to not only the members of the public but also the supervisor. Thus, it is a right-wrong ethical issue.
Question 3 Analyzing of the Case Study for Avco Environmental Service Company
To resolve the situation, the recommendations that should be put forward are the ones that seek to eliminate the moral issues that arise in the case study. For instance, the supervisor of Chantelle should not take the issue of polluting the environment lightly. She should report this to the management for further discussions and a course of action. Moreover, Chantelle should stand for what she believes is right. She should not be afraid of reaching out to the management and bringing them on board on an issue that may affect the entire organization as a whole. Finally, Angela, the Operations Manager does not appear competent in her job and therefore should be fired or offered training on what leads to a firm enjoying the competitive advantage over other competing companies.